The logic of reducing gun related harm by placing more fees upon the law abiding citizen is flawed. Gun owners that have done nothing wrong would be negatively effected by the hindrance of their right to keep and bear arms. If this were to pass the targeted potential wrong doers would be further encouraged to obtain firearms illegally to avoid the city of San Jose's and the state of California's overly complex process of obtaining firearms. Not enough characters are provided to explain myself.
The logic of reducing gun related harm by placing more fees upon the law abiding citizen is flawed. Gun owners that have done nothing wrong would be negatively effected by the hindrance of their right to keep and bear arms. If this were to pass the targeted potential wrong doers would be further encouraged to obtain firearms illegally to avoid the city of San Jose's and the state of California's overly complex process of obtaining firearms. Not enough characters are provided to explain myself.