Meeting: City Council

Meeting Time: June 06, 2023 at 10:46am PDT
The online Comment window has expired

Agenda Item

8.4 23-842 City Initiatives Roadmap: Recreational Vehicles Communities Support Parking and Emergency Interim Housing. - TO BE HEARD CONCURRENTLY WITH ITEM 8.5

  • Default_avatar
    Rose Dai 12 months ago

    The community we are living is already very limited and narrow for us. It is not convenient for us for shopping, parking and doing any other entertainment. We don’t want to share our limited resources with large group of homeless people.

  • Default_avatar
    YaWen Lee 12 months ago

    I object to this proposal

  • Default_avatar
    Lina Mosashvili 12 months ago

    I understand that it is a necessary and helpful facility for the unhoused, but I disagree that it should be located so close to the densely populated residential area, upcoming parks and the Bart station. Different locations should be explored. I am a concerned parent with kids.

  • Default_avatar
    Jiaying Qian 12 months ago

    RV Parking at 1300 Berryessa Rd

  • Default_avatar
    Hannah Du 12 months ago

    Strongly oppose due to safety concerns

  • Default_avatar
    Yingye Zhang 12 months ago

    Our community is quiet, new and surrounded by lots of new development. If we let homeless people live here, all the previous development will be wasted. I am firmly opposed to this proposal.

  • Default_avatar
    Sonal Santan 12 months ago

    Strongly oppose due to safety, law and order, destruction of environment, blight, garbage reasons. This is CA/Sacramento problem and they should own this. Why does San Jose want to become a magnet for homeless and mentally deranged people from CA and USA?

  • Default_avatar
    A C 12 months ago

    Strongly oppose due to safety concerns.

  • Default_avatar
    M C 12 months ago

    Strongly oppose due to safety concerns.

  • Default_avatar
    Evans Wuu 12 months ago

    I oppose this measure.

  • Default_avatar
    Gina Chang 12 months ago

    Strongly oppose due to safety concern.

  • Default_avatar
    S J 12 months ago

    safety concern to the children. Strongly Oppose

  • Default_avatar
    Emily Chiu 12 months ago

    Strongly oppose due to safety concern.

  • Default_avatar
    Hejin Wang 12 months ago

    Oppose the RV park in Berryessa due to escalating homeless population and security concerns.

  • Default_avatar
    Ziming Chen 12 months ago

    Strongly oppose. Concerns with safety and health of the neighborhood

  • Default_avatar
    Biao Zhou 12 months ago

    Strongly against

  • Default_avatar
    J H 12 months ago

    Strongly oppose

  • Default_avatar
    Minghuey Wang 12 months ago

    Strongly oppose

  • Default_avatar
    Weiran Fang 12 months ago

    As a victim of a recent burglary in this neighborhood, I strongly oppose this item. Encouraging RVs as a solution for emergency housing for homeless people raises significant safety concerns, particularly for individuals like me who have already experienced the trauma of burglary. We don't even feel safe living in our own house, and this proposal will even make this situation worse.

  • Default_avatar
    Benjamin DelLaMota 12 months ago

    The areas that are more further from housing and Shopping centers, which are more suitable for dealing with SJ Homeless Issues is:
    Between E Taylor St/Mabury Rd & Las Plumas Ave and HWY 101 & those abandoned railroad tracks behind the Slakey Brother building.
    Even better is between I-880 & W Hedding and Coleman & Spring St.
    And between W Hedding & Emory St and Wainut St & Guadalupe River.